http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2013-07/msg00201.html
These two functions oddly test x+1>0 when a double x is >= 0.0, and
similarly when x is negative. I don't see the point of that since the
test should always be true. I also don't see any need to convert x+1
to integer rather than simply using xr+1. Note that the standard
allows these functions to return any value when the input is outside
the range of long long, but it's not too hard to prevent xr+1
overflowing so that's what I've done.
(With rounding mode FE_UPWARD, x+1 can be a lot more than what you
might naively expect, but perhaps that situation was covered by the
x - xrf < 1.0 test.)
* sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/s_llround.c (__llround): Rewrite.
* sysdeps/powerpc/fpu/s_llroundf.c (__llroundf): Rewrite.
da13146da1